Provider · company data
Coresignal
Raw public-web employee and company data at scale, aimed at investors and data teams.
Benchmark results
| Suite | Precision | Size accuracy | Depth | Coverage | Latency p50 / p95 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company searchpartial run | 16.1% | 51.1% | 7/25 | 9/12 | 191ms / 320ms |
What reviewers across the web say
Coresignal's public review base is sparse — roughly a dozen reviews each on G2 (4.5) and Datarade (4.8) — which fits a vendor selling bulk datasets to data teams rather than seats to salespeople. Sentiment is positive about the scale and freshness of the raw data, while the recurring criticisms are the absence of contact data (no emails or phones), a clunky self-serve experience (one Reddit tester scored it 6/10), and a high upfront commitment before quality can be assessed.
| Platform | Rating | Reviews | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| G2 | 4.5 / 5 | 12 | g2.com |
| Datarade | 4.8 / 5 | 12 | datarade.ai |
- Among the largest raw B2B datasets on the market (859M+ employee records) with solid schema consistency. [1][2]
- Pipeline-friendly API and bulk delivery formats that data engineers find easy to build on. [1]
- Data is well maintained and refreshed frequently relative to other bulk-dataset vendors. [1][2]
- No verified emails or direct dials, so outbound sales teams must pair it with a separate contact-data tool. [1][2]
- Built for data engineers and analysts, not end users; the self-serve UI is considered rough and glitchy. [1]
- Requires significant upfront investment before teams can properly evaluate data quality, unlike vendors with easier trial paths. [1][2]
“doesn't actually save the information that you're searching” — source
Aggregated 2026-07 from public review platforms and communities; every claim links to its source. Full review roundup →
Who uses Coresignal? Evidence-based customer list →